Separate invitation from opt-in
Two states, two numbers. Collapsing them is the most common way a campaign looks healthier than it is.
Where testers come from, how to recruit at the volume you need, and how to keep them opted in and active for the whole testing window.
Recruiting splits into filling a roster and keeping it filled. Filling is a supply problem: finding enough people with Android devices and a Google account who will install an app they have no particular reason to use.
Keeping it filled is a durability problem. Testers agree readily and follow through inconsistently, and the ones who drop out do so silently. Most recruitment effort goes into the first problem and most of the risk sits in the second.
Most opt-in failures are avoidable with a short message that covers the four things testers get wrong.
Two states, two numbers. Collapsing them is the most common way a campaign looks healthier than it is.
A tester who opted in and stopped opening the app is the failure mode nobody announces. Activity tracking is what surfaces it.
Agree how many quiet days trigger a nudge and how many trigger a replacement, so the decision is not made under time pressure.
Recruiting a few extra people against dropout is cheaper than recruiting in a hurry at day ten.
Four messages cover the whole campaign. Anything more is usually ignored.
The roster is what makes recruitment measurable: who was asked, who responded, and who is still there.
Four fields per person is enough to answer every question that comes up mid-campaign: who is missing, who has gone quiet, and who is carrying the testing.
However testers are recruited, they end up in one place: the tester list on the closed testing track. Everything before that is sourcing.

Send us the app and the number of testers you need. We will build the roster, chase the opt-ins and tell you early if any slots are not being claimed.